Dropdown Menu

Sep 29, 2020

A Case of Angioedema or Nodular Urticaria

 A 6 year old boy having large nodular urticaria on forehead every evening for 5 months. Parent's consulted to a Dermatologist, who prescribed anti-allergic tablets and treatment was continue for more than 3 months. If the boy don't take a medicine some day, the large nodular itchy eruptions appear on forehead. Doctor said, take the medicine like a diabetic take whole life.


On September 18, 2020 the parents consulted for Homeopathic option. Three doses of two medicines prescribed with some sac-lac.


On September 29th, patient has reported no urticaria since 22nd of September. Urticaria cured. Patient and parents are happy for not to take medicine for his whole life.


Prescription:


1. Nux Vomica 200 CH. 3 doses with 2 hour interval on day one.


2. Apis 200 CH. 3 doses with 2 hour interval on day four.


3. Sac Lac  BD for seven days.


Repertorization Chart






Jun 19, 2020

The Highest Ideal of Cure

Hahnemann's Organon: A Plain Discussion

By
Dr Rajeev Khanna
Dr Ravindra Singh Mann



The Highest Ideal of Cure

Before we start discussion on this topic, we want to share two examples from the history to understand the nature of medical environment and treatment methods before and during Hahnemann.

Example-1. 

Louis-13th was King of France from 1610 to 1643, after the death of his father, he became king when he was just 9 years old. Louis-13th  died of Crohn's disease and tuberculosis in 1643. James Bouvard was physician to King Louis-13th of France.

James Bouvard, the physician, ordered 47 bleeding, 215 emetics or purgatives, and 312 enemas during the period of one year, for his health problems.

Louis XIII died in Paris on 14 May 1643. 

According to his biographer A. Lloyd Moote, "his intestines were inflamed and ulcerated, making digestion virtually impossible; tuberculosis had spread to his lungs, accompanied by habitual cough. Either of these major ailments, or the accumulation of minor problems, may have killed him, not to mention physiological weaknesses that made him prone to disease or his doctors' remedies of enemas and bleedings, which continued right to his death."

Example-2.

George Washington, first president of USA died on 14 December 1799 at his home after a brief illness. Modern medical experts says that the illness as diagnosed by his physicians isn’t one of those serious illnesses that may likely cause to death. 

On December 12, 1799, two days before his death he was absolutely healthy, he went to inspect his farms on horseback in snowing and cold weather. He returned home late for dinner, When he returned he was wet but he refused to change out of his wet clothes, because he didn’t want to keep his guests waiting. Next day he had little sore throat but again went out in freezing, snowy weather for his work. 

That night, Washington woke his wife Martha to say he was feeling very sick, and that he could hardly breathe or talk on his own. The former President asked his overseer, Albin Rawlins, to bleed him. (To draw nearly a pint of his blood, bloodletting being a common practice of the time.) His family called Doctors James Craik, Gustavus Richard Brown, and Elisha C. Dick for blood-letting.


Dr. Brown thought Washington had quinsy (an accumulation of pus due to an infection behind the tonsil); 

Dr. Dick thought it is more serious "violent inflammation of the throat". 

They continued the process of blood-letting and bled him four more times over the next eight hours, approximately five pints blood was drawn ( One Pint = 473.18 ml), with a total blood loss of 40 percent. But Washington's condition deteriorated further. He was having difficulty in breathing and cough.

Washington also gargled with a mixture of molasses, vinegar and butter; he inhaled a steam of vinegar and hot water; and his throat also was swabbed with a salve and a preparation of dried beetles.

Dr. Dick proposed tracheotomy, but the others doctors disapproved. And in a 21-hour period Washington died On December 14, 1799.

÷÷÷÷÷

After reading above two examples you might understand that at the time of Hahnemann, medicine was in state of chaos. Physicians were speculating the medical theory as a product of imagination. Each one was contradicting the other. All were engaged in finding a basis for treatment of diseases in speculations about interior states, the invisible, internal changes in organs of the body and without knowing the cause of diseases.

During Hahnemann's time leeching, cauterisation, blistering, and other torturesome practices were common in day to day practice. Methods of treatment were more painful than original disease in many cases. We can conclude, from examples above, that death was equally possible from methods of treatment as from natural disease.

So, just after declaring the very object of Physician in first aphorism, Hahnemann outlined clearly 'The Highest Ideal of Cure' in second aphorism.

"The highest ideal of cure is rapid, gentle, permanent restoration of the health, or removal and anihilation of the disease in it's whole extent, in the shortest, most reliable and most harmless way, on easily comprehensible principles".

Again in this aphorism many words have been used, let’s have look on them :

highest ideal of cure 
rapid and gentle, 
permanent restoration of the health, 
or removal and annihilation of the disease in it's              whole extent, 
shortest, most reliable and most harmless way, 
on easily comprehensible principles".

This aphorism indicate many indirect meanings:-

1. A diseased person is already suffering a lot. So the cure must be rapid and shortest. Sooner a person get treated, it is better for him. The shortest method of treatment is the ideal method of treatment. 

2. Method of treatment must be gentle and harmless. As we learned from the examples at the beginning of discussion, the prevalent methods of treatment, at the time of Hahnemann were more torturous than disease itself.  

Leeching, bleeding, strong purgatives and emetics cannot be called as easy, gentle methods of treatment they are more painful methods, and to add such a method of treatment to already suffering person is not a wise idea.

Nothing could be better to the patient if a painless method of treatment could be discovered. And this is certainly one of the factors of 'the highest ideal of cure'. The use of words 'gentle' and 'harmless' by Hahnemann in second aphorism, emphasize his idea of empathy and responsibility towards patient's sufferings.

3. In state of health a person is in a condition of ease or comfort. But disease loses this equilibrium and person start to face sufferings. Cure means to alter from sufferings, again to state of ease, comfort and health.  

The cure is a condition to regain the same equilibrium again which was lost earlier by disease. A partial restoration of health in which few sign and symptoms are recovered, or a temporary restoration of health in which after a short recovery, person again face the suffering or disease, can not be termed a Cure.
Palliation or suppression of symptoms should not be our ideal.

4. Hahnemann propagate the holistic conception of the organism while defining the Ideal of Cure. He emphasize that only complete annihilation of sign and symptoms of original disease can be termed as cure. 

A suffering may be manifested as many symptoms, of which some may be more painful than others. But every symptom indicates a deviation from health, so each and every symptom have got to be removed to cure the disease in its whole extent.

5. At Hahnemannian time, medical theories were based on emperical guesswork, imaginations of physician, ages old unscientific hypothesises of Galen and some other ancient physicians. Hahnemann proposed that practice of medicine must be based on scientific principles, deduced from observations, generalisations and experimental verifications. These scientific principles based on observations and verifications must be organised and developed as a Therapeutic Law. And treatment methods need to be based on this therapeutic law.   
 
As per Hahnemann's view, the Therapeutic Law discovered by such scientific methods will be the 'Most Reliable' and 'Easily Comprehensible'.


On these terms, Hahnemann coined the idea of 'the Highest ideal of Cure'. 

Jun 3, 2020

Mission of Physician

Hahnemann's Organon: A Plain Discussion

By

Dr Rajeev Khanna
Dr Ravindra Singh Mann



Mission of Physician

All of us are learning Homoeopathy, isn’t it? But here is a question - WHY? What is the answer? Why are we here to learn Homoeopathy or why anyone should  take admission in this course?

Before reading further please write down your answer.  It will make our journey easier.

Okay. Now let's start our discussion- most of the time students reciprocate this question in simple statement that they want to be a Homoeopathic Physician, that is the reason they have decided to be here. 

Fair enough, what will you do once you will become a physician? Simple answer again is – we will treat the patient. 

Yes ! Of course.  

But, according to Dr Hahnemann, what should be the precise parameters of "treatment" are narrated in first aphorism.

The first aphorism of Organon is about the first formal question of our profession. 

Question- What is the mission of a physician?

And answer is- “The physician’s high and only mission is to restore the sick to health, to cure, as it is termed*. ”

It is very easy to grasp and memorize this simple statement but whole life is less to learn and practice it skillfully.

The whole journey of Homoeopaths go on to understand the exact connotations of this aphorism.

Let us try to explain the few words comprising the first aphorism.

These are:–

• The Physician
•  High and Only Mission
•  Restore
•  The sick
•   Health
•   Cure
•   As it is termed


Putting a phrase before every word “what is the meaning of__________”, will give an insight about Hahnemann's idea  about Mission of Physician.


Our search in dictionaries will find the following:–

The physician

• a person skilled in the art of healing.
• specifically : one educated, clinically experienced, and licensed to practice medicine as usually distinguished from surgery.

Mission

• Your own mission in life can be anything you pursue with almost religious enthusiasm.
• A task or job that someone is given to do.
• A pre-established and often self-imposed objective or purpose.

Hahnemann used the German word "Beruf" in original text, which means "profession" in English, but R. E. Dudgeon's use of word "mission" gave a religious tone to first aphorism.

Restore

• to put or bring back into a former or original state.

Sick

• Physically or mentally ill; not well or healthy.

Health

• The condition of being sound in body, mind, or spirit.
• Freedom from physical disease or pain.

Cure

• Relieving (a person or animal) symptoms of a disease or condition.
• To restore to health, soundness, or normality.
• To free from something objectionable or harmful.

When Hahnemann says , “The physician’s high and only mission is to restore the sick to health, to cure, as it is termed”, he is talking about a person who is skilled, well trained, educated in medical science, a man who uses his skill as an art to heal the sick, who is different from Surgeon, and who doesn’t remove organ or body part to get rid off the illness of a patient, but treats the patient skillfully with the help of medicine. 

What is important here to underline is that Hahnemann was not in favour of surgery as a treatment plan. He was concerned to treat the patient with help of medicine, this concern seems strange here but when we read some other aphorisms it draw a lucid and more sensible picture. 

But for here and now, Hahnemann was not in favor of surgery.

ONLY- Mission” again has a profound meaning. We can discuss many things about disease in depth, as the name of disease, the diagnostic features of disease, how deep seated is the disease, is the disease curable or not; but when a sick person comes to a doctor his main requirement is to become healthy again. 

Though it is important to know the cause of ailment,  depth of the sickness, diagnosis and prognosis of disease (how long it will take to cure), and if the disease is curable or not. As a doctor we may explain all the above points to patient but still explaining the details of disease is not physician’s goal. His goal is to treat the patient, to restore his health. That is the reason Hahnemann used the word ONLY-mission. He explained in the footnote of this aphorism as well.

Restore has its own unique meaning here, when Hahnemann emphasize "restore", he wants to say that body should not compromise its any organ or part removed by surgery as a treatment. Even if a person survives after removal of any body part we can not say, as health is restored, because restore means -to bring back to or put back into a former or original state. If any organ/part is removed it can not be called as an original state. And the mission of physician was to “RESTORE”,  to bring back the health to original state.

SICK- who is sick- sick is a person who is mentally or physically not well or healthy. Here is important to note the word "A PERSON" and not a body part. For example if a person is having headache, head is not sick, it is a man who is sick having some symptoms of head. But the orthodox school of treatment (Allopathy) focused on treating the headache and medicine is targeted to that organ/part only. In Hahnemann’s view it is always "a person" who requires the treatment as a sick. So when a physician is treating any sickness he must find the SICK man and not the Organ/ Part affected by some symptoms. Finding the sick will be discussed later in detail. 

Health and Cure- simple meaning is to bring back to normal health and make a person free from objectionable or harmful disease and relieve of the symptoms, detail of cure will be discussed with next aphorism.

May 25, 2020

कोविड-19 रोगियों पर हैड्रॉक्सिक्लोरोक्वीन के प्रभाव की रिपोर्ट


कोविड रोगियों में हाइड्रॉक्सीक्लोरोक्वीन दवा लेने वाले हर छठे व्यक्ति की मौत-  लैंसेट रिसर्च

प्रसिद्ध मेडिकल जर्नल द लैंसेट ने कोविड-19 रोगियों पर हैड्रॉक्सिक्लोरोक्वीन दवा के प्रभावों का सबसे बड़ा अध्ययन प्रकाशित किया है, इस अध्ययन के अनुसार कोविड-19 के मरीजों को मलेरिया की दवा देना बेहद खतरनाक है.

मेडिकल जर्नल द लैंसेट में प्रकाशित रिपोर्ट में कहा गया है कि हाइड्रॉक्सीक्लोरोक्वीन दवा लेने वाले हर छठे व्यक्ति की मौत हो गयी. 

दुनिया के 671 अस्पतालों के 96 हजार से ज्यादा मरीजों पर हुए अध्ययन के ये आंकड़े हैं. रिसर्च में यह पाया गया है कि जिन समूहों में ये दवा दी गई उनमें मृत्यु दर, उन समूहों से अधिक पाई गई, जिन्हें यह दवा नहीं दी गई.

रिसर्च के आधार पर चार तरह के परिणाम बताए गए हैं:–

1. जिन रोगियों को हाइड्रोक्सीक्लोरोक्वीन दवा दी गई, उनमें हर 6 में से एक व्यक्ति की मौत हो गई.

2.जिन्हें हाइड्रोक्सीक्लोरोक्वीन के साथ एक एंटीबायोटिक दवा दी गई, उनमें चार में से एक की मौत हो गई.

3. जिन्हें क्लोरोक्वीन के साथ एक एंटीबायोटिक दी गई, उनमें हर 5 में से एक की मौत हुई.

5. जिन कोविड-19 के मरीजों को इनमें से कोई दवा नहीं दी गई, उनमें 11 में से एक की मौत हुई.

एंटीबायोटिक के साथ हाइड्रॉक्सीक्लोरोक्वीन देने के नतीजे सबसे भयानक रहे. हर चौथे मरीज की मौत हो गई. 

अध्ययन का नेतृत्व कर रहे प्रोफेसर मनदीप ने बताया कि क्लोरोक्वीन या हाइड्रॉक्सीक्लोरोक्वीन से कोविड-19 मरीजों को कोई फायदा नहीं होता है. इसे आंकड़ों में साबित करने वाला अब तक का यह सबसे व्यापक अध्ययन माना जा रहा है.

डॉ रविंद्र सिंह मान


May 12, 2020

Unscientific explanation of Corona Infection by Dr P Vijayakar

In his video, posted on Predictive Homoeopathy page on facebook(April 13, 2020), Dr Vijayakar has imposed a defective explanation about Corona Infection, Covid-19 disease and it's Homoeopathic management.

The defects in his explanation are manifold. I want to divide these flaws in two broad categories, based on issues related to Modern Medicine and secondly, issues related to theoretical and practical part of Homoeopathy.

Modern Medicine issues:-

Cause of COVID-19 according to Dr Vijayakar

Dr Vijayakar propagates the "injury to earth" as the cause of COVID-19 disease. In his clarification, electro-magnatic waves, or waves of 5G networks may cause this kind of "injury to earth". This "injury" further increased the vulnerability of Human DNA and RNA. In consequence of this "earth injruy" human DNA/RNA becomes "fragile". And according to Dr Vijayakar, this "fragility" is basic cause of COVID-19 disease. 

False and Unscientific Explanation of Cause

Modern physics, does not accept this kind of "injury to earth" by electro-magnatic waves or waves of 5G network. 

Modern medicine explains under Genetics that "fragility sites" on DNA may cause defective repair of DNA/RNA, which may cause various carcinomas, but any "viral disease" related to DNA fragility sites is yet unknown.

In last four months, while the CORONA virus infection is prevalent in humans, various scientific studies are continuous all over the world, but still there is no link discovered between Corona virus infection and "DNA/RNA fragility", in humans. So we can certainly propound that any claim of "fragility of DNA/RNA" as etiology of Corona infection is not based on facts, and totally unscientific.

It would be ridiculous to ask that in purview of "earth injury", why only humans are suffering? Every living being has some kind of DNA/RNA sequence in their cells, why only humans are dying? Although, we already know Corona viruses infect cows, pigs, bats, chickens and other animals as well. Only humans are recent victims.

Homoeopathic issues:–

Theoretical matters-

Although their is no accepted explanation yet, that why the death rates in Western part of the world is much more than Eastern part. Scientists are suggesting various causes, but they are not certain until they found any explanation with evidences. 

But, Dr Vijayakar, claimed that Indians have "herd immunity" due to their "Satvik" genes which the westerners are lacking. Due to these superior quality of genes, Indians have only physiological or Psoric manifestation of COVID-19 disease while Western world has destructive-syphilitic manifestations, due to which their RNA-Genome is committing suicide. 

But all the above explanation is transcending the Hahnemannian "Miasma theory". Even, it can be said, Dr Vijayakar's explanation does not compatible to Hahnemannian Homoeopathy, but something else.

Practical Matters-

While explaining the management of COVID-19 and Corona infection, Dr Vijayakar classify the patients under three categories. 

In, Stage I, Psoric approach, he suggests to use his "Acute Chart" for management.

In, Stage II,  where patients are asymptomatic, he explains virus is hiding and patient is Indifferent. Dr Vijayakar advised to take rubric INDIFFERENT, and suggests Sepia 200 on behalf of this rubric. Further he advises, to drop this medicine on patient's heel and spray medicine around home to use as preventive.

In, Stage III, when sudden Pneumonia, Multiple Organ Failure, high fevers start to pose a threat to life, Dr Vijayakar describes this as INSANITY, or MADNESS of GENOME. He termed this stage as CRAZY STAGE, and suggests to choose rubric INSANITY, MADNESS. Here, he prescribes VERATRUM ALBUM  50 M, as a curative medicine.

In Hahnemannian homoeopathy, either to select a preventive medicine(Genus Epidemics) or for a prescription, we need to collect all the sign and symptoms of a patient, organise and classify those clinical features, first as Mental Generals, Physical Generals, Particulars, Modalities, Concomitants, then to mark as PQRS and SRP. After the classification of clinical symptoms, we select rubrics from this raw data to analyse a case with help of repertorisation charting.

Let us quote from Organon:-


"It may easily happen that in the first case of an epidemic disease that presents itself to the physician's notice he does not at once obtain a knowledge of its complete picture, as it is only by a close observation of several cases of every such collective disease that he can become conversant with the totality of its signs and symptoms. The carefully observing physician can, however, from the examination of even the first and second patients, often arrive so nearly at a knowledge of the true state as to have in his mind a characteristic portrait of it, and even to succeed in finding a suitable, homoeopathically adapted remedy for it" (Organon of Medicine, §101) .

James Tyler Kent also emphasize the similar methodology :-

Kent described in the third lesson of his Lectures on Homoeopathic Philosophy a semiotic protocol to diagnose the group of medicines of the epidemic genius . He proposes to observe 20 patients affected by an epidemic disease, recording all symptoms in a schematic way (repertory classification) that when addressed collectively "will present one image, as if one man had had expressed all the symptoms".
 
By placing before each symptom the number of patients exhibiting them, the homeopath will be able to "find out the essential features of the epidemic" (nature of the disease) through the common (pathognomonic symptoms) and characteristic (peculiar symptoms) symptomatic totalities. 

Sadly, Dr Vijayakar does not follow both the Masters of Homoeopathy. His methodology in selecting a preventive medicine as well as curative one, does not follow the prevalent methodology in Homoeopathy.

A person of well repute and trustworthy guide of many Homoeopaths, can not be reckless, irresponsible and unscientific in his public statements in matters of such a big concerns. 

We are surprised on the blind faith expressd by our fellow homoeopaths on Predictive Homoeopathy. Are they blind indeed?


©2020 Dr Ravindra Singh Mann
©2020 Dr Vandana Patni